Collaboration without the head-shaving

Thanks to Thomas Cott of You’ve Cott Mail for pointing the Nonprofiteer to this article in Crain’s New York Business about the value of collaboration among small arts organizations as typified by the Lower Manhattan Arts League.

The league — which includes small groups like Access Theater and larger organizations such as Dance New Amsterdam and the Children’s Museum of the Arts — has monthly meetings where constituents help each other with everything from fundraising to legal advice. The groups have created a downtown cultural festival, which they produce in the fall and spring. The members even apply for some grants as one entity and lobby the city government as a pack. Individually, some members with budgets as small as $100,000 are barely on funders’ radar, but as a group the members generate around $14 million in economic activity per year and employ roughly 1,200 people full- and part-time. After years when none of the groups were able to score a grant from American Express, for example, the consortium applied together in 2009 and was awarded $100,000. They divvied up the money according to the size of each budget.

While the cheery tone of the article elides some of the serious difficulties arts organizations face in aligning their missions and needs with one another, the point is nonetheless well-taken: organizations too small to get attention on their own may be big enough when combined with others to secure foundation funding and government cooperation.

Such collaborations also serve as living ripostes to the chronic funder complaint that the supply of arts organizations exceeds the demand for them: if these disparate groups can work together without cannibalizing their audiences or funding, they must not be duplicating each other’s work. Or, as it is written: the whole [collaborative network] is greater than the sum of its parts.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Collaboration without the head-shaving”

  1. Jean Butzen Says:

    Nice article on collaborations. There are lots of actual examples of arts collaborations available the Collaboration Prize web site hosted at the Foundation Center web site: Arts organizations have done amazing things partnering together while maintaining their autonomy and their independent missions.

    • Nonprofiteer Says:

      I agree; and Chicago is a hot-bed of collaborative arts activity, from the League of Chicago Theatres to neighborhood consortia of performance organizations sharing marketing expenditures.

  2. Meetings and Play-Dates « Project Management Underground Says:

    […] without email, limits, headaches, chaos, costs, co-location, and even – inexplicably – head shaving.  To our credit, we cannot apparently have collaboration without communication nor common […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: