<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Existing forever versus doing some good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonprofiteer.net/2012/03/28/existing-forever-versus-doing-some-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonprofiteer.net/2012/03/28/existing-forever-versus-doing-some-good/</link>
	<description>Nonprofits Without The Nonsense--and that&#039;s just the tip of the iceberg!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Morse Wooster</title>
		<link>http://nonprofiteer.net/2012/03/28/existing-forever-versus-doing-some-good/#comment-12107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Morse Wooster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonprofiteer.net/?p=3198#comment-12107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across a 2012 post you wrote about why foundations should spend down. I thought it was thoughtful and I am responding to it.

Let me say at the outset:  I&#039;m not only a conservative who believes in donor intent, I wrote the only book on the subject.  It has gone through three editions and I am working on the fourth.  As part of the fourth edition, I am condensing and updating a monograph I wrote in 1998 called SHOULD FOUNDATIONS LIVE FOREVER? THE PROBLEM OF PERPETUITY.  If you would like a copy of this, I would be delighted to send it to you.

I think what you want and what I want are not far apart.  I would like donors to spend their fortunes in their lifetimes or no later than 30 years after their deaths.  I would like donors to do so voluntarily because it is the right thing to do.  I am opposed to any mandated increases in the payout rate.

I frequently go to philanthropy seminars at the Hudson Institute and what I find is that in terms of philanthropic practice (as opposed to what donors should spend their money on), liberals and conservatives agree about 85 percent of the time.  I think what we are both opposed to is the flabby old foundation who pays out as little as they can legally.

I think the left and the right should learn from each other rather than fight each other, so in that spirit I have written this email.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across a 2012 post you wrote about why foundations should spend down. I thought it was thoughtful and I am responding to it.</p>
<p>Let me say at the outset:  I&#8217;m not only a conservative who believes in donor intent, I wrote the only book on the subject.  It has gone through three editions and I am working on the fourth.  As part of the fourth edition, I am condensing and updating a monograph I wrote in 1998 called SHOULD FOUNDATIONS LIVE FOREVER? THE PROBLEM OF PERPETUITY.  If you would like a copy of this, I would be delighted to send it to you.</p>
<p>I think what you want and what I want are not far apart.  I would like donors to spend their fortunes in their lifetimes or no later than 30 years after their deaths.  I would like donors to do so voluntarily because it is the right thing to do.  I am opposed to any mandated increases in the payout rate.</p>
<p>I frequently go to philanthropy seminars at the Hudson Institute and what I find is that in terms of philanthropic practice (as opposed to what donors should spend their money on), liberals and conservatives agree about 85 percent of the time.  I think what we are both opposed to is the flabby old foundation who pays out as little as they can legally.</p>
<p>I think the left and the right should learn from each other rather than fight each other, so in that spirit I have written this email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
