<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffett/Gates: Is a Puzzlement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonprofiteer.net/2006/07/06/buffettgates-is-a-puzzlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonprofiteer.net/2006/07/06/buffettgates-is-a-puzzlement/</link>
	<description>Nonprofits Without The Nonsense--and that&#039;s just the tip of the iceberg!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://nonprofiteer.net/2006/07/06/buffettgates-is-a-puzzlement/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anita Bernstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonprofiteer.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/buffettgates-is-a-puzzlement/#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the Internet nobody knows you&#039;re a dog, right?  So I can pretend to be the man explaining himself:
1.  I&#039;m contrarian.  Rich guys live one way; I live another.
2.  I&#039;m turned off by the proliferation of new foundations.  Way too many doing the same thing.  The tax advantage the Nonprofiteer mentions, I think it&#039;s wrong.  Maybe Congress can change it.  Maybe if Warren Buffett declines to put up his name in lights, Joe-Schmoe-net-worth-$5-million will consider the same option.
3.  I&#039;m not like Gates.  He and the foundation barons of the last century--Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie--made their fortunes as industrialists.  I&#039;m an investor.  The virtues of investing are (they tell me) diversification, patience, and deferring to local experts--all of which discourage the formation of bold new enterprises.
4.  The Nonprofiteer presumes I am concerned about the future.  I guess that&#039;s right, but I&#039;m skeptical about philanthropy.  I am not sure charity ever changed anything systemic.  But because the thought of leaving billions upon billions to my kids turns my stomach, I have to make some kind of giveaway.  To what?  Specific causes--Waterborne illness!  Literacy!  Infant mortality!--seem both too narrow and too wide as targets.  So I give my proxy to someone else.
5.  If the money turns out badly spent, posterity will blame the other guy.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Internet nobody knows you&#8217;re a dog, right?  So I can pretend to be the man explaining himself:<br />
1.  I&#8217;m contrarian.  Rich guys live one way; I live another.<br />
2.  I&#8217;m turned off by the proliferation of new foundations.  Way too many doing the same thing.  The tax advantage the Nonprofiteer mentions, I think it&#8217;s wrong.  Maybe Congress can change it.  Maybe if Warren Buffett declines to put up his name in lights, Joe-Schmoe-net-worth-$5-million will consider the same option.<br />
3.  I&#8217;m not like Gates.  He and the foundation barons of the last century&#8211;Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie&#8211;made their fortunes as industrialists.  I&#8217;m an investor.  The virtues of investing are (they tell me) diversification, patience, and deferring to local experts&#8211;all of which discourage the formation of bold new enterprises.<br />
4.  The Nonprofiteer presumes I am concerned about the future.  I guess that&#8217;s right, but I&#8217;m skeptical about philanthropy.  I am not sure charity ever changed anything systemic.  But because the thought of leaving billions upon billions to my kids turns my stomach, I have to make some kind of giveaway.  To what?  Specific causes&#8211;Waterborne illness!  Literacy!  Infant mortality!&#8211;seem both too narrow and too wide as targets.  So I give my proxy to someone else.<br />
5.  If the money turns out badly spent, posterity will blame the other guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
